Implementing email feedback loops is a crucial step for any organization sending bulk email. Feedback loops provide valuable data from major ISPs about how recipients are interacting with your messages, allowing you to identify and address issues like spam complaints, invalid email addresses, and subscriber engagement. This comprehensive guide walks through the process of setting up feedback loops, processing the data, and integrating it into your email systems for improved deliverability and subscriber relationships.
Understanding Email Feedback Loops
An email feedback loop (FBL) is a service offered by many major ISPs that forwards spam complaints and other negative feedback from their users back to the original sender. When an email recipient marks one of your messages as spam, the ISP sends an abuse report back to you via the feedback loop, allowing you to remove that subscriber and avoid future complaints.
Feedback loops are essential for maintaining good email hygiene and sender reputation. By processing abuse complaints promptly, you demonstrate to ISPs that you take user feedback seriously and are committed to sending only desired, engaging email.
The diagram below outlines the basic feedback loop process:Setting Up Feedback Loops with Major ISPs
To receive feedback loop data, you need to sign up for the FBL service with each major ISP. The registration process varies between providers but typically involves:
- Authenticating your sending domains with SPF and DKIM
- Publishing a valid abuse@ mailbox to receive reports
- Filling out the ISP's FBL application form
- Agreeing to the provider's terms of service
Here are direct links to register for the major ISP feedback loops:
- AOL Feedback Loop
- Comcast Feedback Loop
- Cox Feedback Loop
- Outlook/Hotmail Feedback Loop
- Spectrum Feedback Loop
- Verizon Media Group (Yahoo/AOL) Feedback Loop
Once registered, you will start receiving feedback loop reports at your designated mailbox, typically abuse@yourdomain.com. The reports are generated in Abuse Reporting Format (ARF) as defined in RFC 6650.
Here's an example of the ARF report format:From: abusedesk@isp.example.com
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2005 17:40:36 EDT
Subject: FW: Abuse Notification for IP 10.67.41.167
To: abuse@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=feedback-report;
boundary="part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary"
--part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
This is an email abuse report for an email message from IP 10.67.41.167,
received on Fri, 27 Dec 2018 11:19:58 EDT. For more information about this format please see http://www.mipassoc.org/arf/.
--part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
Content-Type: message/feedback-report
Feedback-Type: abuse
User-Agent: SomeGenerator/1.0
Version: 1
Processing Feedback Loop Reports
To extract meaningful insights from feedback loop data, you need to parse the ARF reports and load them into a queryable system like a database or log management platform. The basic steps are:
- Ingest ARF reports from your abuse@ mailbox
- Parse the report contents to extract:
- ISP sending the report
- Recipient email address that submitted complaint
- Sending IP address for original message
- Subject line of reported message
- Feedback-Type (will be "abuse" for spam complaints)
- Sanitize and normalize the extracted data
- Store the standardized data in database or logs for analysis
mailparser
library:
import mailparser
import json
mail = mailparser.parse_from_file('sample_abuse_report.eml')
arf_report = mail.get_payload()[1]
arf_data = {
'reported_by': arf_report.headers['Reported-By'],
'reporting_mta': arf_report.headers['Reporting-MTA'],
'source_ip': arf_report.headers['Source-IP'],
'feedback_type': arf_report.headers['Feedback-Type'],
'original_rcpt_to': arf_report.headers['Original-Rcpt-To'],
'original_mail_from': arf_report.headers['Original-Mail-From'],
'arrival_date': arf_report.headers['Arrival-Date'],
}
print(json.dumps(arf_data, indent=2))
This would output a structured JSON object like:
{
"reported_by": "spam@isp.com",
"reporting_mta": "isp.com",
"source_ip": "10.67.41.167",
"feedback_type": "abuse",
"original_rcpt_to": "victim@example.net",
"original_mail_from": "sender@example.com",
"arrival_date": "Fri, 27 Dec 2018 19:19:58 -0600"
}
This diagram illustrates the key steps in processing feedback loop data:
Tools for Processing Feedback Loop Data
There are several open-source and commercial tools available to help manage the feedback loop process, including:
- FBL Processor - Open-source Perl scripts for parsing ARF reports
- FBL Handler - Open-source Python package for handling feedback loop data
- Mailgun - Email service that parses and forwards feedback loops to your webhooks
- Sendgrid - Email API with a Spam Reports webhook to process FBL data
Using a feedback loop service or webhook integration can greatly simplify the data collection process, but you still need to have systems in place to store and analyze the complaints, as discussed in the next section.
Integrating Feedback Data into Your Email Systems
The real value of feedback loops comes from acting on the data to improve your email program. To make that possible, you need to feed the processed complaints into your larger email ecosystem, including:
Subscriber Database/CRM
Automatically unsubscribe complainers to avoid further issues and maintain list hygiene.
Reputation Monitoring
View complaint rates across ISPs and domains to identify delivery issues or content problems.
Engagement Segmentation
Analyze engaged vs unengaged subscribers and create more targeted campaigns.
Content Optimization
Use complaint data to A/B test subject lines, templates, and offers for lower spam rates.
- Set up automated rules to unsubscribe complainers to maintain list hygiene
- Create SQL queries or scripts to calculate important metrics like:
- Complaint rate by ISP and domain (complaints / delivered emails)
- Complaint rate by campaign and subscriber segment
- Delivery rate impact of complaints (successful deliveries / sent emails)
- Visualize complaint trends in your BI dashboards for better visibility
- Set alerts for spikes in complaint rates to identify issues proactively
SELECT
isp,
COUNT(CASE WHEN feedback_type = 'abuse' THEN 1 END) AS complaints,
COUNT(*) AS total_delivered,
ROUND(
100.0 * COUNT(CASE WHEN feedback_type = 'abuse' THEN 1 END) / COUNT(*),
2
) AS complaint_rate
FROM fbl_reports
WHERE created_at BETWEEN '2022-01-01' AND '2022-03-31'
GROUP BY isp;
Sample output:
ISP | Complaints | Delivered Emails | Complaint Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Outlook.com | 25 | 10,230 | 0.51% |
AOL | 12 | 5,500 | 0.22% |
Comcast | 43 | 22,600 | 0.19% |
Feedback Loop Best Practices
To get the most value out of feedback loops, follow these best practices:
- Register with all major ISPs - More FBL coverage means better insights into your email performance
- Unsubscribe complainers immediately - Continuing to email them will only cause more damage to your sending reputation
- Keep FBL data secure - Protect complainers' personal information and don't use it for any other purpose
- Monitor trends over time - Look for patterns in complaint rates by ISP, domain, type of content, etc to understand what drives negative engagement
- Watch for spam trap hits - Getting consistent FBL complaints for the same address likely means it's a recycled spam trap and should be removed
Troubleshooting Common Feedback Loop Issues
Even with proper setup, feedback loops can experience issues that disrupt your reporting. Here are some common problems and how to resolve them:
If you don't receive any reports after registering for FBLs:
- Check that your abuse@ address is configured properly
- Make sure you are using correct DKIM signatures for your domains